Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Rebecca, what happens if you assume for the moment that the freemen requests are done in order of age?
In this scenario:
Thomas #1 was made/requested freeman 17 Apr 1637 - likely Thomas Wheeler [Sr.] "of Warley" b abt 1591 and he who married Ann Halsey 5 May 1613. I'm thinking that it's he who is likely listed on the 1635 "James"-- he'd be 44, whereas the younger Thomases would only have been 15 and 14, respectively. I know, not definitive.
Thomas #7 was made/requested freeman 7 Oct 1641 - likely Thomas Wheeler, "Jr." youngest son of Thomas the Elder, younger brother of Thomas Sr, bapt Cranfield in 1620 and therefore 21.
Thomas #8 was made/requested freeman 18 May 1642 - likely son of Thomas #1/Thomas Sr; chr 8 Dec 1821 Cranfield and therefore 21.
That's as far as I can get right now.
-- Jillaine
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/wheeler/messages/9600.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|