Re: Wade/Oakford, NJ, 1600/1700s
-
In reply to:
Re: Wade/Oakford, NJ, 1600/1700s
Eldric Sechrest 10/14/01
Thanks, Norm, but what the heck does this mean??" to New Salem where they inhabited
Joseph, s Samuel & Mary, b 7-28-1705 Milisent [Waid], dt Joseph & Hannah, b 6-29-1729"
How does someone "inhabit" someone else?Does that mean Joseph, s Samuel & Mary, lived with them?I'm assuming.Maybe if I check out all the Edwards lines, might find a Wade married to an Oakford.I've looked at the Hinshaw CD so much, it makes me dizzy.:-)Couldn't find anything more than what I have in the records at the SLC library either.
If you should come across an Oakford and Wade marriage..............
Thanks again,
Esther