Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited”
-
In reply to:
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
9/10/01
Only one part of this requires a response:
Violeta Voorhees 1924 letter, as it pertains to the meeting/marriage of Luther and Maria, is NOT...and I repeat "NOT"..a historical document.While it can be considered a Historical document in the life of Violeta Voorhees, it is nothing more than hearsay evidence to the Eastling/VS controversey.She makes no reference to supporting records/documentation.Violet's letter is as much a historical document in the ancestry of Maria VS Eastling, as this post is.Perhaps that is Mr Gusman's problem....he has no clue what a historical document is, and the concept of genealogy research is beyond his comprehension.Is there any hope for him?Probably not.Now...can we all get back to real genealogy?