Starting Sept. 5, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: VanSickle Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Van Curen are we being flim flamd
Posted by: M V Huren Date: June 21, 2001 at 09:58:43
In Reply to: Re: Van Curen are we being flim flamd by David Van Sickle of 1583

You are certainly correct. I agree completely. The key to resolving the disagreement is to quite slamming each other and for Mr Van Curen to provide documents which support his alternate theory that Maria Van Sicklen (not Maria Van Siclen) married Luther Eastling.

Mr Gusman challenged the Eastling connection with the Van Sicklen genealogy and submitted documents that appear to support his challenge.

It is not unreasonable for us to expect Mr. Van Curen to provide conclusive evidence proving that his version of the marriage of Maria Van Sicklen (not Maria Van Siclen) to Luther created a legitimate connection with the Van Sicklen ancestry.

Altering data in Mr. Gusman's documents, as Mr. Van Curen has done, proves nothing. Mr. Van Curen must submit original evidence as proof for the marriage of Maria Van Sicklen to Luther.








Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/vansickle/messages/569.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Agreement of Use
Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network