Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: VanSickle Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited”
Posted by: Ed Gusman (ID *****7908) Date: January 07, 2003 at 08:19:53
In Reply to: Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited” by Richard Alan McCool of 1583

Richard wrote - "I have sought to make it plain that today's DAR is very much different from its origins. Thus , Phebe's application would surely be rejected by the organization we know today."

Gusman - Are you attempting to tell me that if a women applies for DAR membership today and she is not able to include copies of original documentation showing Revolutionary Service that her membership application would be rejected?

Are you trying to generalize with Phebe's or be humorous? The name of the applicant was Violetta Voorhees.

Ed


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/vansickle/messages/1077.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network