Starting Sept. 30, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: VanSickle Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited”
Posted by: Richard Alan McCool (ID *****7472) Date: December 25, 2002 at 07:37:21
In Reply to: Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited” by Beth Evans of 1585

Dear Beth,

For some, most I guess, genealogy is a hobby. For others it is a serious scholarly effort, backed up by years of training and determined research. This is not to say that a hobbyist cannot be serious, have no training or experience.

But it is important to try to distinguish between the two. Neither Mr. Van Curen nor myself would waste our genealogical time with this thread that you find juvenile unless we thought it was important. Erroneous posts to this Forum, or anywhere, should not be left to stand on their own without challenge. Fortunately for hobbyists and genealogists alike, there are folks like Mr. Van Curen who will spend considerable time, taken away from their research time, to try to stop the recirculation of bad genealogy when it appears.

There is a certain sense of responsibility in this.

Yours,

Richard


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/vansickle/messages/1059.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network