"If we do not have a share expense equally contract, I will not be a party to the endeavor of achieving DNA comparison between Maria Van Siclen and Annetje Lawson."
Understandable response. You think that by insisting I pay half, that I won't be willing to go through with DNA testing. It's your way out, while saving face. I say the loser should pay all the costs. That's the way it must be. DNA testing would only benefit you. Everyone else already knows the truth. So, why should I pay for half of your education? If you are so confident, then why aren't you willing to put your money where your mouth is? The "why" is obvious. You already know your case is a loser. So you try to come up with a clever way to dodge DNA, without letting everyone know that your case is a lost cause. Sorry, Eddy...but we all saw right through it. You have no records, and you are unwilling to chance getting stuck with a bill for DNA testing. That tells us all we need to know about your "confidence" in the affadavits. You know they are fiction.
Notify Administrator about this message?
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|