Starting Sept. 30, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Vanamburgh Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: need info on "VanAmber" spelling
Posted by: James Russell Brokaw (ID *****3912) Date: July 24, 2004 at 14:41:26
In Reply to: Re: need info on "VanAmber" spelling by Jon Van Amber of 71

I think you are "overrationalizing" the "change" in spelling. We run into the same problem on the Brokaw Family Genealogical Forum. People are always speculating on WHEN and WHY the name was changed; the assumption is that it was all part of a rational process. Undoubtedly there are some cases in which the spelling of a surname was deliberately changed. But for the most part the changes simply happened. (Like Topsy, they just grew!) It's hard for us to realize that rules of spelling are a fairly recent innovation. As far as the Vanamburgh spelling is concerned. I understand that it was originally Imbroch or Van Imbroch. Somewhere along the line people started pronouncing it Van Amburg(h) but in my own family it starts (in Nova Scotia) as Van Emburg(h) and sometimes appears as Van Imburg(h). Apparently there are Ambers, Van Ambers, and other variations almost without number.
--Russ Brokaw


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/vanamburgh/messages/57.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network