Starting Sept. 30, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: General Topics: Ultimate Family Tree Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Posted by: Phil Rhoton Date: April 08, 2000 at 10:04:28
In Reply to: Re: UFT & TMG by Catherine Fullerton of 11492

I am not currently using it. I have it installed on my computer and did transfer my database with the intention of switching. There was some cleanup mainly with text items because TMG handles those differently than UFT. I also had to do some work with the events in my database because TMG allows only two principal roles per event but allows unlimited witnesses.

I should mention my main beefs with TMG are:
1. You can't use embedded footnotes in their "memos" which is disastrous to me because I don't use the "canned sentences" that go with the events in UFT and TMG
2. With UFT you can document EVERYTHING and you can do that with TMG as well but the footnote apears at the end of the sentence and not with the information it's referencing.
3. The reports aren't very attractive. Remind me of the very early Roots reports.
4. The two principal and multiple witness thing I mentioned above.

On the plus side you can document parent-child relationship easier, perform intricate searches, and manipulate your data in multiple ways.



Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Agreement of Use
Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network