|
|
Actually the Dna says Richard Tyner of elbert ga is not a match to john Harris or his male descendants. Trees have incorrectly listed him as a son of John Harris Tyner not John Harris Sr. It will be difficult to get everyone to correct the inacurate data Sarah was too old to have Richard as a son so we must not create a other inacurate tree by adding him as a son is Sarah to make him fit somewhere like the past adding him as a son of John HArris Tyner was based on land transactions and a sons name. Sometimes that is all we have except now DNA comes into play and blew this theory out of the water so let's not add him to anyone until there is better proof could a Harris descendant or even Sarah raise him and he changed his names from holmes to Tyner, yes it is possible Could he be the illegitimate son of Sarah's daughter and reubin holmes father? Yes it too is possible Could he be the son of john Harris Sr's sister and a holmes and raised in a Tyner household? It is possible going on no one has proven that Sarah was the daughter of Nicholas. She may have been the wife of a Tyner, like Nicholas son Richard, and kept the Tyner last name if he died or left. Just way too many possibilities for this bunch to stick one theory in a tree Guess what I'm saying is that Richard belongs to no parent or sibling at this point and his DNA matches several Holmes testers but a connection to them has not been established either. So let's not create another bunch of trees with him as the son of Sarah:) Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |