Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Since you haven't answered my posting to you on 1/27/01, I wondered if you had read my other posting on the same date, with the subject line of:
"John Townzen-Stewart Co-FACTS", and decided that your other message was not correct. I know it's sometimes difficult to admit when a "theory" you've posted is proven to be incorrect, but it happens to everyone as some time or another. Especially if we're the sort of true genealogists who want to be sure our pedigree consists of OUR ancestors, and not someone elses. But if you haven't ready my message I mentioned above, it might be a good idea to do so. And if you still believe your "theory" is correct, then I wonder why you haven't answered my questions??
Betty
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/tounzen/messages/16.html | ||
 |
Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|