Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
In reply to:
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
5/28/01
I thank you for taking the time to respond, however, looking at the dates of the children, it seems clear that their father must have born later that 1754. Since Ephraim and Lydia were married in 1800 Brunswick, I am going with the Ephraim b. 1779 as their father and am looking for more information on Lydia Brown.The Ephraim b. 1754 was the son of Seth and Hannah as you said, and the Ephraim b. 1779 was the grandson of Seth & Hannah.Maggie
More Replies:
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
PAULA TOOTHAKER 6/10/01
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
Maggie 6/11/01
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
PAULA TOOTHAKER 6/11/01
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
Maggie 6/13/01
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
PAULA TOOTHAKER 7/04/01
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
PAULA TOOTHAKER 6/21/02
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
Maggie Musselman 6/21/02
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
PAULA TOOTHAKER 7/02/02
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754
-
Re: Ephraim Toothaker error - b 1779 or 1754