Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service Jump to Forum Home: Surnames: Tolman Family Genealogy Forum Re: Ann Tolman Posted by: Richard Husband (ID *****6467) Date: October 15, 2009 at 15:39:25 In Reply to: Re: Ann Tolman by Larry Kline of 232 Hi, Larry: I meant to put this in my last post. There is this statement, by James Savage, in his discussion of Peter Lyon, and Savage is usually accurate: "Peter, Dorchester ... His sec. w. Hannah or Ann, was d. of Thomas Tolman, and d. 26 Nov. 1689." It is in Vol. 3, p. 137 of Savage, at: http://www.archive.org/stream/agenealogicaldi03dextgoog#page/n146/mode/1up As it is under Lyon, that is probably why the Lyon researchers claim the relationship (Ann d. of Thomas). I just don't see anything else, though, to support the relationship, and Tolman researchers seem to definitely reject it. Notify Administrator about this message? Followups: Re: Ann Tolman Larry Kline 10/15/09 Re: Ann Tolman Richard Husband 10/15/09 http://genforum.genealogy.com/tolman/messages/230.html Search this forum: Find all of the words Find any of the words Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching Link to GenForum Add Forum

Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate

© 2009 Ancestry.com