|
|
Just an additional observation; that was an excellent response by Art Sykes. Your Samuel b. 1642 was probably b. in 1637. There is a baptismal record giving 4 Feb 1637, and taking into account that his mother, Margaret Hulins, was b. prob. abt 1595, it's unlikely that Samuel could have been born in 1642. Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |