Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
-
In reply to:
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
James Harrell 9/28/01
i am sorry about my mistake on the census...sometimes i am not as sharp as i should be...as to the list of chillun....i agree with the list as it stands....as to the isaac married mary thing....while he was a bit old please bear in mind that the sumrall men really had a perchant for much younger women....some of the men in this expanded family had marraiges in their 50-60's to women in their teens and 20's...i do think that if we had a difinitive list of "isaac's decendants" the issue would be somewhat clearer....if isaac was born in 1853 he would have been 37 at the time of marraige to mary macurdy.... depends on how old mary was....like i told teresa in my message to her... we aint finished the bowl of pudding yet on this family and surely aint licked the bowl....
as to them moving....i have no hard proof in re to that... just my personal thoughts... my time machine is broken so im not sure yet what exactly happened...moses could have died and the children and luticia may have decided to just leave the stigma of jones co area behind....
will have to keep looking....
mookie
More Replies:
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
James Harrell 9/28/01
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
mookie 9/28/01
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
mookie 9/28/01
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
James Harrell 9/28/01
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
mookie 9/28/01
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss
-
Re: sidney sumrall / scott co miss