Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service Jump to Forum Home: Regional: Countries: Scotland Genealogy Forum Re: Adam to James Murray {1665-1704} Posted by: Don Gillies (ID *****7955) Date: June 24, 2009 at 21:47:07 In Reply to: Re: Adam to James Murray {1665-1704} by William Dyer of 59305 Hi William, The reason I asked if it is an unbroken list is this. There are 154 generations on your ancestral list. Even exagerrating the parents ages to 50, this only takes the list back 7700 years from James. The first evidence of man in Scotland goes back 12 thousand years, and in other parts of the world goes back much further. Or have I got my figures wrong ? Notify Administrator about this message? Followups: Re: Adam to James Murray {1665-1704} William Dyer 6/25/09 http://genforum.genealogy.com/scotland/messages/58462.html Search this forum: Find all of the words Find any of the words Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching Link to GenForum Add Forum

Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate

© 2009 Ancestry.com