Re: Patrick Rutherford
-
In reply to:
Re: Patrick Rutherford
Marcia Ceisel 11/30/04
Hi Marcia,
I know what you mean about the proof.
Thomas was suppose to have been the father of the James I have been researching.The trouble with all these names, Thomas, James and Josephs were every Rutherford had one.
Patricks will should tell where the children were when he died.
Do you know or have you heard of the Kennedy woman who furnished that information?
I have been at a brick wall with James born 1791 for years.
He is listed in all of WKR's books from 69 to 86.
Have you checked the tax list for N.C. 1810?
I wish I knew more.
Chuck who is on this forum found a Patrick, he might be able to help.
Paulyne
More Replies:
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford
Marcia Ceisel 12/01/04
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford
Glyndell Adams 12/02/04
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford
Joe Ceisel 12/03/04
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford
Paulyne Rutherford Taylor 12/01/04
-
Re: Patrick Rutherford