Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
>All you have is the acquiescence of family
>members AFTER the death of cousin President Franklin >Roosevelt.
The U.S.A. investigation here started in 1920's so BEFORE
FDR's death.
Even today there are Ro(o)sevelts on both sides of the ocean.
>Also, I find it a shame that all of the biographies &
>histories written about my 3-famous cousins in discussing
>their ancestry selectively fails to mention THE ORIGINAL-
>genealogical knowledge of near HAARLEM, NORTH HOLLAND--
>said Morgan's biography is the only exception.
Why would that be you think.
[Instead,
it is the Tholen, Zeeland-business that is propigated.
What the biographers & historians needed to have done
instead would have been to present BOTH the ORIGINAL
family tradition of coming from near HAARLEM, NORTH HOLLAND,
and then its being supplanted by the Tholen, Zeeland-business in the "chronicle"-format as I had did in my first
"Chronicle Research American Roosevelt Family's Cradle in
HOLLAND"-entry from information I had & from information
you supplied showing the development from THE ORIGINAL
near HAARLEM, NORTH HOLLAND, and how it developed to be
down in Oud-Vossemeer, Tholen, Zeeland, in the south of HOLLAND. This would proved the public with the whole
story, letting the public weigh the evidence and decide
for themselves whether HAARLEM or Vossemeer. I have weighed
the evidence and I concur with FDR. You and many of my
contemporary cousins apparently concur with Vossemeer.
And here we have the "mexican-stand-off". ]
If I get (some copies of records)of a (small) family
Ro(o)sevelt in Haarlem, I will place them on my site,
as part of my Dutch Ro(o)sevelts.
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/roosevelt/messages/182.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|