Re: James Talton RINGO
-
In reply to:
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 1/08/02
Thanks for your response,yes this is the family whom I am reffering.However,Sarah E. was an ARNOLD.I have never found her with a TALTON surname.I would like more information on the James Talton RINGO, or the Talton J. RINGO.I have who he married in 1893, I think that date may be wrong.And I also think it was his second wife.Although I have not been able to confirm that.I would love to get this all straight.Thanks for your help, Vicki
[email protected]
More Replies:
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
C Ringo 8/08/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 1/08/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
1/08/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 1/08/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
1/08/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 1/09/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
1/09/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 1/15/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
C Ringo 8/15/02
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
tracy davis 1/31/03
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
C Ringo 1/31/03
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
Jim Ringo 2/01/03
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
tracy davis 2/01/03
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO
-
Re: James Talton RINGO