Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Radcliff Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Given names were usually only one; not two.
Posted by: Gary Radcliffe (ID *****2932) Date: November 25, 2008 at 18:10:08
In Reply to: Re: Given names were usually only one; not two. by Melissa Ratcliffe Crow of 649

Daniel OR Stephen. I'm convinced. It was you who once
suspected that Richard Ratcliff's sons were not all
mentioned in any documents or family trees. This would be
true of his brother James RaDcliff who emigrated 1685, three years after Richard came to Maryland.

I've been following that track for some time with no luck
but it almost has to be accurate due to the DNA results.

Funny how many times I wrote or phoned Clarence Ratcliff and neither of us suspected we were related. Don, Earl's
son, is now in Chicago. He doesn't look anything like me; no one does. And aren't they lucky? Great to hear from you again, Mel.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/radcliff/messages/636.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2009 Ancestry.com