Shaker vs. Quaker
http://www.rootsweb.com/~quakers/shakers.htmhttp://www.rootsweb.com/~quakers/shakers.htm
The differences between being Shaker and Quaker
Mother Anne Lee, who started the Shaker movement, was formerly a Quaker, and she did incorporate some of her Quaker background into Shaker practices: simplicity, financial responsibility, work ethic, belief in the perfectibility of humankind... among them. She and her followers believed her to be the second incarnation of Christ. Shakers were a celibate sect, and expanded their membership through adult conversions and the rearing of orphans, who were given a choice of joining the Shakers, or going out into the world when they became of legal age. They were an exclusively American movement, mainly located in New England and New York. Their worship included many lively songs--and dances-- of praise to God. The Quakers originated in England in the mid 17th century. They rebelled against the rigid hierarchy and government control prevalent in the Anglican church, and began meeting in homes or buildings without steeples, waiting upon God silently to make His presence felt and inwardly heard. Any person could be called by God to rise and preach upon any occasion of worship. They were much persecuted in England before finding refuge in the American colonies. They were, and are, very family oriented, far from being celibate, and would not agree that Anne Lee is the second incarnation of Christ. They also have historically not withdrawn from the world but have been very active in the cause of social justice for the poor and oppressed, education, humanitarian relief, and the humane treatment of prisoners in penal institutions.
While Shakers have nearly died out, Quakerism, though limited in numbers by comparison to mainline and evangelical Protestants, is alive and growing, both in the USA and in Africa and South America and other nations overseas. Many have today adopted the custom of having a person designated as primarily a pastor, and most are neither white English speaking nor North American, since the greatest growth in the past generation has been outside of England and the USA.
This is a great abridgment and oversimplification of the histories of the two groups, Quakers and Shakers, but gives you an indication of the major differences. For a good short readable history of Quakers, I recommend to you Howard Brinton's *Friends for 300 Years*. I hope this helps thee.
Julia Ewen
Atlanta Friends Meeting
Atlanta GA USA
More Replies:
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
5/11/01
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
Richard Gifford 5/19/01
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
5/19/01
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
Richard Gifford 5/24/01
-
Re: Quakers during the American Revolution
Janet Watling 8/18/04
-
Re: Quakers during the American Revolution
lisa monk 4/25/07
-
Re: Quakers during the American Revolution
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
Esther Crebbin Mitchell 9/30/01
-
Re: Quakers during the American Revolution
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
J. mitchell 11/07/04
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
Millard Arnold 12/06/02
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
gene stoddard 11/03/05
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
Louise Lofstrom 4/23/02
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker
-
Re: Shaker vs. Quaker