Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
In reply to:
James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
12/05/99
Hi, Tex ---- It's me, Joshua Pearre "Pete" Hamilton, 5-great grandson of the James Pearre you are researching.I haven't corresponded with you for a while; have I told you that I found several Pearre descendants in Maryland who have provided me with pretty good evidence that the Pearre's were Scottish --- not French.(I have always considered my name to have had a French origin).
Last time I checked, it wasn't certain that Alexander Pearre's wife Sarah was a Beall; have you found conclusive evidence that she was?
Anyway, its good to have a Pearre page on the GenForum website, at long last.Hope we find some "cousins".
Pete Hamilton
More Replies:
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Jane Sheridan 7/10/03
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Sandy Campbell 8/08/09
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Jane Sheridan 8/08/09
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Sandy Campbell 8/08/09
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
4/26/01
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
3/05/00
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
JAMES WILLIAMS 3/09/00
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
12/26/01
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
mai manning 4/03/03
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Jacqueline Perry 1/27/05
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
Ana Graham 5/02/05
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
4/28/00
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.
-
Re: James Pearre 1680 to 1763 MD.