Starting Sept. 30, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: General Topics: Personal Ancestral File Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: My PAF file is too large and unwieldy now?
Posted by: Cliff Barney (ID *****1498) Date: April 21, 2004 at 03:59:48
In Reply to: My PAF file is too large and unwieldy now? by bhk of 4837

Hi Betsy -

I've been doing this for nearly fifty years, so no longer consider myself a "Newby." I have a 3 x 5" index card catalogue big enough for a small library, since for decades that was the only way to index all the paper records.

I started using PAF when it was a baby (PAF 1.0, I think) about 11 or 12 years ago. For years I kept separate PAF files: "Massachusetts Barneys," "Maryland Barneys," "English Barneys," "Scottish Barneys," etc. That worked OK when the files were small, but got to be tedious after awhile -- especially when a Massachusetts Barney descendant married a Maryland Barney descendant, for example.

So 7-8 years ago I just combined all my separate files into one gigantic file, which I've been using & updating ever since. Had a bit of a problem with PAF 3.0 or PAF 4.0 (index generation was WAY too slow), but am very happy with PAF 5.2. There are over 200,000 Barneys & their descendants in my (so-called) master Barney file.

-- Cliff in Virginia

Notify Administrator about this message?

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network