Starting Sept. 5, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: U.S. States: New Hampshire Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Info on John and Lucinda Burke
Posted by: Thomas Kerwin (ID *****3248) Date: November 12, 2011 at 07:46:02
In Reply to: Info on John and Lucinda Burke by Gary Burke of 11454

I’m not related to any member of this family.

1930 is the last available census at this time.

These statements explain WHY you will not find John Burke's parents listed with him on any census page.

Facts you should know about the early census records -
All census records [1790 – 1840] prior to the 1850 census ONLY listed the head of household; whether male or female.
NO specific age was stated for any family member
NO place of birth was stated – city, state, or country
NO city, town, or village is stated – only the county; however some census takers listed the township
NO street address was stated
NO marital status was stated – single, married, widowed, or divorced
NO family relationship was stated – brother, sister, cousin, son, daughter, wife, inlaw, etc…
NO occupation was stated
NO parental birthplaces are stated                     
NO race was stated [but assume “white”]
1850, 1860 & 1870 census records do not show family relationships, marital status or parental birthplaces.

Step children are not enumerated as “step” children
Adopted children are not enumerated as “adopted”
Grand children are not enumerated as “grand children”
Orphaned children were not enumerated as "orphan"

1850 is the 1st census that shows all family members

1880 is the 1st census that shows parental birthplaces +++

STORY from another researcher -
It appears that Thomas Burk fought in the American Revolution. However we have conflicting information about his participation. In one source, a newspaper article that appeared in a local newspaper in Susquehanna Co., Pennsylvania (where his daughter Joanna was living), the article states he served in the Navy. No further details are provided. In 1853, Thomas Burk's wife, Eleanor Thurston, filed for a Government pension based on his war service. She stated, in a deposition, that he had fought in the war as a soldier, and had been wounded twice, once at the Battle of Brandywine Creek (New Jersey) and once at the Battle of Monmouth (New Jersey). Her pension claim was denied because she could not remember what regiment he served in nor could she remember which state he had served under. There is some evidence that Thomas Burk and Thomas Shadduck, apparently two close friends, may have served together in the war. Both men moved to New Hampshire after the war and had families there. Thomas Burk's daughter, Joanna, eventually married Thomas Shadduck's son, also named Thomas.

marriage record -
Date: 28 April 1793
Location: Hanover, New Hampshire
to Eleanor Thurston

Source: Revolutionary War Pension File -
Source Information
Revolutionary War Pension File
National Archives, Washington D.C.
Publisher Location
Publisher Date
Call Number - R1456
Notes - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -
This file is the widow's application for pension. The "R" designates the pension was denied.
D.A.R. Library

Notify Administrator about this message?
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network