Re: Mullinax, Bruce, Jenkins
-
In reply to:
Mullinax, Bruce, Jenkins
Jimmy Anderson 11/09/03
I think that I can tell you who the Bruce kids were, but don't have a clue about the connection to Deck.
GA Marriage Record --
John W Bruce md Rachael Mullinax 15 Oct 1848 Lumpkin Co, GA
They are found in 1850 Cass Co, GA Div 12 --
1465
MULLENAX, Albert36 SC--- Is this really Holbert???
Martha36 SC
James E17 GA (all the others)
Mary A15
Nancy13
Andrew V11
Lucinda9
Margaret7
Sinai3
Rachele1
Evaline Anderson40
Wilson Smith40
Andrew Hutson22
1468
BRUCE, John W21 GA
Rachel20 GA -- nee Mullinax md 15 Oct 1848 Lumpkin Co, GA
Louisa1 GA
1471
MULLENAX, Joseph B 37 GA (all) -- Joseph Berry Mullinax
Lucinda26 -- nee Powell
Thomas8
Oliver6
James4
Andrew1
MULLENAX, Andrew22
Leah8/12
1850 Lumpkin Co, GAKilaughs
15
MULENAX, Thomas43 SC
Anna43 SC -- should be Agnes nee Knowles
George15 GA (same for others)
Eliza13 -- not listed in 1860 & yes, there were 2 Eliza listed here
Eliza11
Mary7 -- Agnes in 1860
Ann?4-- Francina in 1860
1860 Dawson Co, GAKilough
722 / 608
MULLINAX, Thomas53 SC
Agnes54 SC
Eliza20 GA (same for others)
Agnes16
Francina14
/ 609
Andrew32 -- s/o Thomas
Margaret10 -- Leah from 1850
Joberry6/12
ROW, Cordelia19
Elizabeth2
NOTE:This is the Andrew Mullinax who was living in the Joseph B Mullinax household in 1850 Cass Co.He was widowed in 1850 with a child and again widowed with another child in 1860 living in the household of his parents here from what I have been reading.Looks like just a county name change for Thomas here in 1860.
1860 Polk Co, GADist 1072
BRUCE, J W31
Rachel C28
Thomas6
George3
Elijah1
Mullinax, Eliza 22
NOTE:This is Rachel Mullinax who md John W Bruce in 1848 Lumpkin Co.This Eliza Mullinix matches the older Eliza who was in Thomas Mullinax's 1850 census and then missing in 1860.Why were there 2 Eliza in Thomas's household?Possible that the women here were daus of Thomas Mullinax.Rachel was living between Albert & Joseph Berry Mullinax in 1850 Cass Co.Also possible that there could be a connection for Rachael to the "Albert" (possible Holbert Mullinax listed above them in 1850).
1870 Polk Co, GA
879 / 932
BRUCE, John W41 GA (all)
Rachael C39
Thomas14
George13
John8
Ella4
William2
NOTE:Here's the Thomas, Ella & William that are found in the 1880 Deck household in Lumpkin Co, GA and their ages correspond to these children.I am not finding John W Bruce or Rachael in the 1880 census, so possible that these kids were orphaned in 1880.
When I first started looking for info on the Bruce / Mullinax marriage that took place in Lumpkin, I found the following family in 1850 Lumpkin (Samfords) --
56
BRUCE, John45 SC
Rachel42 SC
Bailes22 GA
Amanda18 GA
George16 GA
James10 SC
David15 GA
Malinda14 GA
Madison12 GA
Nancy8 GA
Susanna6 GA
Jane4 GA
Think this was just a coincidence in names, but this older John Bruce & wife Rachel could be possible parents for the John W Bruce who md Rachel Mullinax.I've looked at family trees that are listed on Ancestry for this family, but they are such a mess and all seem to be copying & using the same data.Just didn't find anything that looked dependable.If you are interested in more of the Mullinax notes on this family, you can contact me directly at [email protected].
Hope this helps.
Sharon S
More Replies:
-
Re: Mullinax, Bruce, Jenkins
Judy Rieke 3/19/07