|
|
Hello Melissa I suspect the first name Sanford was far too common to be useful as a genealogy "clue". In 1880 it was showing up about once in every 1500 males (a lot more often than I would have expected). John Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |