Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: McKinsey Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Census History of George McKinsey - b ca 1760-1770
Posted by: Lois Johnson (ID *****7844) Date: March 30, 2009 at 14:53:17
  of 304

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:


The following is the Census History for George McKINSEY {With Variant Spellings}:

Father of: Abigail McKINSEY b 7th June 1788, Newberry Co., South Carolina.


NOTE: The Age Group for George McKINSEY shows in parenthesis

1790 – Federal Census - 96th District, Newberry Co., SC – Heads of Families
McKENSEY, Geo. – Free White Males of 16 years and upwards – Including Heads of Families {2}
Free White Males under 16 years of age – 3
Free White Females – 4

1800 – Federal Census - Newberry District – South Carolina

McKINNE, George – Free White Males – 0-10 – 2
16-28 – 2
26-45 – { 1 }
Free White Females 0-10 – 1
10-16 – 1
45 & Up - 1

1810 – This Census Is Not Available for George McKINSEY.

1820 – Federal Census - Warren Co., Ohio – Wayne Township

McKINNY, G. – Free White Males – 10-16 – 1
45 & Up – { 1 }
Free White Females – 16-26 - 1

1830 Federal Census – Warren Co., Ohio – Harveysburg       

McKINSEY, George – Free White Persons:
Males – 20-30 – 1
60-70 – {1 – George McKINSEY}
Free White Females – 0-5 – 1
15-20 – 1
60-70 – 1

1840 Federal Census – Warren Co., Ohio, Wayne Township

McKINSON {McKINSEN}, Patrick – Free White Males
0-5 – 1
5-10 – 2
15-20 – 1
30-40 – 1 - Patrick McKINSEY
70-80 – {1 - George McKINSEY}

Free White Females - 0-5 – 1
5-10 – 1
30-40 – 1

CONCLUSION: “The Documentation Above” clearly shows, those who gave the information to the Census Takers in South Carolina and Ohio, from 1790 to 1840, For George McKENSEY - Knew Him To Have Been:

.............................b ca 1760-1770...............

This means the 1773 – 8th January – Newberry Co., SC Deed, found in Deed Book D-2,Pgs 7-11:

From: Thomas & Sarah SHAW
To: George McKINSEY

Would have been to another George McKINSEY as the George McKINSEY “Of The Above Census Documentation” - would have been at most:

...........13 years old – And - “Not Of Age”!......

There is also this to be added:

From: Individuals Living In The Lower Part of Ninety-Six District in the Fork of Broad and Saluda Rivers by Ge Lee Corley Hendrix and Morn McKoy Lindsay, pg 89 & 92

In 1778:

Nehemiah THOMAS
George McKENEY

Here again, this would not have been the George McKINSEY: “Of The Above Census Documentation” - as he would have been at most:

...................18 years old – And - “Not Of Age”!....


Respectfully Submitted,

Lois Jennings Johnson




Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/mckinsey/messages/289.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2009 Ancestry.com