Starting Sept. 30, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Lusk Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Samuel Lusk - Sarah Bailey - male descendants?
Posted by: Kevin West (ID *****5212) Date: December 17, 2007 at 08:14:34
In Reply to: Re: Samuel Lusk - Sarah Bailey - male descendants? by Alethea Bothwell of 2000

Hi Mike,

Lee is correct. Having a y-chromosome test run on your DNA sample would only yeild information on your Miller ancestry. The y-chromosome is only passed from father to son, never to a daughter. Its what determines you being a male.

So your ancesstress Rebecca (Lusk) Miller would not have inherited the y-chromosome from her father John C. Lusk and therefore would not have been able to pass it on to her offspring.

Like Lee, I'd be interested to read more about your Lusk ancestry. My Lusks ended up in Missouri too. They migrated from Mercer Co. VA (later WV) to Cedar Co. MO in the 1850s.



Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/lusk/messages/1759.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network