Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
But David: Where is your proof "which if he was born in 1715 would have made him only 39 years old"??? Where is the proof he was born 1715 [other than Atty Hutchins affidavit. Which is hardly proof]?
Moreover, you say the "only documented proof of a John Longfellow is to Joseph Longfellow 6 Jan 1740." Would you be kind enough to please post that proof? Have you got a grip on the generations, e.g., proof the immigrant Joseph gave birth to somebody in 1740? Excuse me?
I repeat. It is HIGHLY UNLIKELY the Joseph granted the 50-acres of land was the immigrant. HIGHLY UNLIKELY if you project his likely age when he witnessed the will in 1710. More likely it was a son!!!!!! But I have yet to find proof of that.
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/longfellow/messages/609.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|