Big changes have come to Genealogy.com — all content is now read-only, and member subscriptions and the Shop have been discontinued.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: General Topics: Battle of Little Big Horn Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Miles Keogh...Thank you
Posted by: Melani Van Petten (ID *****4840) Date: February 25, 2007 at 16:53:26
In Reply to: Re: Miles Keogh...Thank you by Anthony (Tony) Soika of 187

Actually, Keogh and Custer were the only ones who weren't mutilated. I think the "LOL" probably referred to the irony of being descended from warriors on both sides of the conflict. Also, mutilations done by Plains Indians on their dead enemies sometimes had spiritual significance. They believed that whatever the body looked like was how the person would appear in the spirit world, so they might cut off the trigger finger or put out the eyes of a particular enemy, to make it difficult for him to come after them in the spirit world.
I find this a lot less disgusting than the mutilations performed by Chivington's men on the Cheyenne at Sand Creek, since the troopers'cultural backgrounds did not include this tradition, but rather reflected the attitude you have displayed, making their behavior a major abberation.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/littlebighorn/messages/141.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network