Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
What makes you think the name was Butler?..just asking, as
I have been an past historical member of the Bruton Parish church, I can fairly well prove that through this connection of the early Lawson with the Larkin/Marston/Martin that if the information I have been given is correct, and it seems to be from the earliest of records I've been able to pick up..there is an strong strong "suggestion" that the Larkin/Lawson line might be the son's of the English Crown that were "done in" by their cruel uncle Richard...or were they..some say "no". I feel that Edward Larkin's wife of Charlestown, Mass named as Joanna was in the immigration of other family to Virgina, as Joane Wilde, and in England, I have her husband as John "Sansome" and many of our early lineages of Lawson were Ransome and Ramsey names from the Jamestown Plantation of Nathaniel "Causey's Care" or "Clear". I traced this Va. group up to Lancaster Co., Pa. during King Phillip's War era. I have also traced an John Lykins on the Plantation called "Swinhow's" that was killed in Jamestown (see census) back to England by name of the Lawson family.. it fits that era...this includes an Maryland family of the Howards by cross Marriage also. The Lawson name did not evolve into that surname until after the "War of Roses", prior to that they were the "Planegant" family of Royal Rulers coming off William the Conquor. Known as the "high sheriff" (Lawson) family of Northcumberland. They have cross lineages into Scotland and by way of Ireland and the "Matrix" Castle near Dublin. There is only one line in World Family Tree Maker, International Registery for the Nottingham Castle area, for the name of Wilde. William the conquor built this Castle and it's where the young boys were imprisoned in the tower...and it is this Joane Wilde..and her father's name was William, married John Sansone and apparently left, and she was Christianed there also, she supposedly married John Sansone 21, Jan. 1606, Shelton, Nottingham, England.
I would also like to point out that if she were young, that it might of been her "betroyal" date also, I think they said Queen Eleanor of Castill was something like 9 years old when they listed her "married", though the marriage was never "consumated" until she was much older. Joanna/Joane in the immigration records may be an De Wilde and has an foreign connection, I see both names are listed in the surname of "Wilde" family references...and I still question people like Lord Delaware and perhaps the "wheeler" as Wilde earlier also. I am most sure that if she came over here, that it would not be under the name of "Lawson" back then. This is why I am searching the area called "Lawkland" in England in Northcumberland, where many of the lines came from. Let me repeat also, that many of the Royals, if not marrying cousins, married other princes and princesses of other countries, it was customary and a smart thing to do to "keep the peace". Many of the English King's also had palaces in all the foreign lands they visited also. I ask you to go back to Edward Larkin in Massachuestts...and look over that family..and whom they are associated with also. My Larkin lineage are kin to the Purcell family whom owned "Montrose" in Scotland also. These families are associated in part with George Washington also. I feel the Cordis family in Massachuestss was "Custis" in Virgina.
You go look it over and I'll give you another "reference" to it all. Perhaps by then the English people might have
found something also. BTW..I located whom I believe to of been Rev. Doedate Lawson, the prior minster to the Salem
Mass. witch trials area "church" buried in Bruton Parish Church as unknown grave number 40. The Church prior was
Marston Parish and an private early Lawson cemetary I
think to begin with. Here is what remains of this unknown grave..D la 1722. Jamestown was "founded" prior to Massachetts..North Carolina is an earlier one also. Any of the three names(or spelling varriants) could been the same person...Lawson-Lauson-Ransome,Larkin-Lucus/Martin-Marston. Thomas Larkin..NOT Thomas O. Larkin the son, whose second wife was the daughter of William Rogers and Martha (I have to look up more of my details to give you her last name and birthpalce in England..first husband was Thomas Cooper whom was an propeitor of New Jersey, his lineage was called the Earl of Shaftsberry and he amoung others sat on the Board of Proprietors of the "Colony" of North Carolina. Many of these lines would go to Tenneessee later printing "Bibles" to later make one day "Nashville" the Bible captial of the USA/world. The Rogers lineage is an maternal Lawson line. I am not sure if Ann Rogers "fits and seizures" that is mentioned in William Rogers REV.WAR Report is caused from the King Phillips War..see "diary"..or if it is because this family married to close in lineage. I have an "Giles Rogers" in England "burned at the stake" for being an "witch" and/or "pretender" earlier. It may be that they suffered from eplipsey. Just as did "Juluis Ceasar" and I have one lineage of this group back to him also. At first I thought it must be incorrect, but I doubt it...if they were "the crown" at one time...I mean not EVERYONE can be lying exactly.
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/larkin/messages/1961.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|