Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Hi Robert sorry its taken so long to get back to you.I have since found out that Jessie was infact Jane, i was realy excited when i saw your reply, then i realised that it could not be them as their daughter Jean was born in 1900 thats over 100 years after they married. IMPOSSIBLE. Robert thankyou so much for the info anyway,its a pity the 17 couldnot have been 18 .Thanks again Anne.
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/lambie/messages/41.html | ||
 |
Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|