|
|
1. I spoke with Emmett again, just to make sure I had not been out of line with him. When asked directly if he felt an apology was in order, he replied, "No, not at all." I am going to continue to work with him on the James family, regardless of what you said about me. I am not quoting anyone further, you will never believe the truth and I have NO idea why I even felt it necessary to "debate" this subject. You do have a way David, you must have been captain of the debate team. 2.The photos and documents on the website speak for themselves, without bringing innocent bystanders into this garbage. 3. David you stated that the "death" photos of Jesse James should be posted. Had you looked at my website, you would see they have been there all along. Since I do have more webspace now, they will be enlarged, however, next week. 4. As for people not wanting their names brought forward... how can anyone blame them? Look how anyone gets treated who calls Betty on her theory. FACT: the photo she claims to be Archie Samuel, who was born in 1866 and died in 1875. This photo was not taken until after 1897, when Floyd's mother had died. FACT: you can see this and other photos Betty had cropped in her book, in their entirety on the website as well. There is one person standing behind Archie with his hand on his shoulder. I do not intend to argue this any further. I have enough to write a book on it... now there is an idea.. NOT! I have recently received important information on Jesse James and do not feel it necessary to prove that James Lafayette Courtney was not Jesse James, for one reason... there is proof that Jesse James was who he is historically claimed to be. Am I upset, angry, distraught? No, this is just another attempt to "twist" my words and it is utterly laughable. Carry on... Linda Snyder "The James-Younger Gang and Their Kinfolk." ...a genealogy in progress...
|
|
||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |