|
|
And let's not forget the follow-up email from Dr Prinz that I quoted here not too long ago - I quote it again here and it can be put on Linda's website if necessary....."I consulted a forensic mathematician, and using the mutation rate and the number of generations, he calculated a likelihood for the above hypothesis: The data is a humdred or more times more consistent with "related" than "unrelated". Kathy
|
|
||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |