|
|
My gosh David the newspaper article identifies her as Diannah and see the photo on the bottom... right hand is showing. Now you are changing Bettys story. It was her claim not ours. If the *Archie* photo was not so important then why did she put it on her page and use as part of her *evidence* ?
|
|
||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |