Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
For Thomas O'Brien B 1886 (exact), Co. Meath, with a father forenamed Thomas, I found 2 church rcds: 1886 Bohermeem RC parish, and 1886 Bohermeen. Note - they only differ in the last letter. This may be due to a typo during the transcription process.
For Julia O'Brien B 1897 (exact), ditto, I found the same results.
For Michael O'Brien B ???? ditto, I found the same results in 1887.
For Ann Conway M 1885 +/- 1 yr, Co. Meath, I found 1 rcd in 1885, Navan RC parish.
For Thomas O'Brien M ditto, I found ditto. This and Ann's rcd are likely for your ancestors. A view of the detailed rcds should show the marriage was to each other. If so, this validates the rcd. The view should also reveal the parents' names as well as other details. This info will be helpful in validating their birth rcds.
For Ann Conway B 1864 +/- 4 yrs, Co. Meath, with the father's forename unknown, I found 2 rcds: 1865 Bohermeem RC parish and 1865 Bohermeen. Father's forenames were John and John. The B parish clearly is Bohermeen.
For Thomas O'Brien B 1862 ditto, I found 10 rcds: 1858 Skyrne, 1859 Rathkenny, 1862 Bohermeem, 1862 Bohermeen, 1862 Duleek RC parish, 1862 Castletown/Kilpatrick, 1863 Monalvey, 1865 Stamullin, 1866 Bohermeem, and 1866 Bohermeen. Father's forenames were John, John, James, John, James, James, Peter, John, Henry, and Henry. The B parish is likely Bohermeen.
For John Conway M 1860 +/- 4 yrs, Co. Meath, I found 2 rcds: 1861 Bohermeem, and 1861 Bohermeen. A view of the B rcd should reveal the bride's name, and the parents' names.
For James O'Brien M 1858 ditto, I found 2 rcds: 1860 Bohermeem and 1860 Bohermeen. Ditto.
You may be able to take this back at least one more generation.
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/ireland/messages/78468.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|