Starting Sept. 5, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: Countries: Ireland: Louth

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: I go to Drogheda to seek McCann and Louth
Posted by: Ralph Connors (ID *****9163) Date: July 11, 2008 at 13:28:09
In Reply to: I go to Drogheda to seek McCann and Louth by Roseann Leute of 307

You made me REALLY think on this one.

I searched the Irish Family History Foundation's database. It contains 11,500,000 surviving rcds for abt 60% of Irish counties. Rcds B4 1840 are sparse. I confined my search to Co. Louth.

1. For Thomas McCann (+variants) B 1833 +/- 4 yrs, I found 5 B rcds: 1829, 1833, 1835, 1836 & 1837. The respective parishes are: Cooley, Louth, Cooley, Haggardstown & Tallanstown. For Jane McCann (+variants) B 1834 +/- 4 yrs, I found 1 B rcd in 1833 in Cooley parish. A view of the detailed rcds SHOULD list the parents' names. This can validate/invalidate the rcd.

2. For a Robert and Sarah marriage, I found 0 Robert M rcds within a wide range. I found 0 Sarah M rcds, ever. The Louth surname exists, but there are 0 B and 0 M rcds for the Sarah forename in Louth, and the rest of Ireland. There are 3 explanations: 1) the event wasn't rcd'd, 2) the rcd didn't survive, 3) your info isn't correct.

3. For a Robert and Jennie marriage, I found 1 M rcd for Robert in 1808. I found 0 M rcds for the surname Hammon (+variants) in Co. Louth, ever. Perhaps they married in a different county. Since I don't find corresponding M rcds for each party, I conclude the event wasn't rcd'd in Louth and the 1808 rcd for Robert is a false positive. You can search in other counties. These have abt 4,000 Hammon M rcds.

4. For the twins, Ann & Bridget, I searched for a common birth yr AND parish 1808-1832. While there were many Ann & Bridget births (some of each in Cooley), I found 0 matching rcds. I conclude the event wasn't rcd'd, or rcd didn't survive.

5. For Mary McCann B 1828 +/- 4 yrs, I found 14 B rcds, 2 in Cooley: 1828 & 1829. For Michael in the same range, I found 3 B rcds, 2 in Cooley parish: 1822 & 1829. A view of the detailed rcds SHOULD list the parents' names. This can validate/invalidate the rcds.

6. The "Sources" show Cooley parish B rcds as continuous from 1811-1900. The evidence for a "Cooley" home would be compelling if the twins also appeared in Cooley. Are you sure you identified the right children as twins?

In any event, this should be a good base to continue your search. Google the Foundation's name to lead you to the database. Post a msg to Genforum to tell me your results.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/ireland/louth/messages/152.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network