Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
You do good work, Barbara. Not once have you suggested anything which would relate to solving the question of the Lukes, which is what I stated in the 1st place.. Can't you or Nancy come up with a single document, or even a thought process as to how certain conclusions were made? Point made!
Nor have you even mentioned any concern for the theft of intellectual property. Point made!
Me 2, You 0... but this is hollow. I wanted some kind of discussion, perhaps leading to a concensus at least as to the structure of the Hanks family. I have rec'd some pvt email which does address the issues, tho.
BTW, I,. too, am 70 and enjoy a healthy sex life... but that does not say anything about my sperm count.
Barbara, perhaps this will help you understand that there is a perfect way to silence loud-mouth skeptics like me:
PROVE THAT I AM WRONG. You have not even tried. Therefore, what conclusion can any serious researcher draw?
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/hanks/messages/1981.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|