Re: No, that can't be right either....
-
In reply to:
Re: No, that can't be right either....
Jeanne Brooks 1/24/02
Assuming Edmund was born late 1573, he would have to have m. Sarah Unknown say 1591 (at 18), she d. and m. Elizabeth Leeds in say 1592 (at 19), had a son in 1593 at age 20. This son m. Sarah Moore in 1611. It could work. What is the evidence that Ednund m. Elizabeth Leeds?
Ron
More Replies:
-
Re: No, that can't be right either....
Joyce Hoad 3/07/04