Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
-
In reply to:
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
James Gowin 8/25/08
James,
If you are using the DNA evidence to state your claims, then the FACTUAL difference in the results only means that either Joseph is not in your paternal line or not in mine based on how we have traced it through written documentation - not that there is corruption or 'something' in the bloodline.If you are using the DNA evidence AND the characteristics you provided in a different post to state your claim, then NEITHER support it when comparing it to mine.I don't see your FACTUAL evidence anywhere.What I do see is that we are not related - that IS a FACT.
Based on all of these postings, the only way you and I could be related would be if we shared a maternal line (since DNA has proven we DO NOT share a paternal line) - but we do not share the same paternal line from that maternal line therefore THAT is why I would not share the same DNA results, characteristics, or as you say "bloodline' as you.If the Anester on the petition for Micajah is the same as that on the petition for Joseph, then perhaps that is where we could cause question.However, it would only bring into question whether there is a relational maternal point NOT that your DNA results prove there was some form of 'cheaters'.It could be that your Micajah was adopted rather than the other way around.
You may want to better understand DNA and what the results indicate before you throw out accusations or state things like 'bloodline corruption' when your results differ.My statements have been factual.
More Replies:
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
James Gowin 8/25/08
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
Robert gowin 8/25/08
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
James Gowin 8/25/08
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
Robert gowin 8/25/08
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
Robert gowin 8/25/08
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin
Robert gowin 5/21/10
-
Re: Joseph Gowin/Gowan/Going/Goin