Starting Sept. 5, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Gleason Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: English & Irish Gleasons are not related
Posted by: Kevin Gleason Date: June 22, 2000 at 19:25:23
In Reply to: English & Irish Gleasons are not related by Al Gleason of 2187


I have a question on your comment "Obviously the two lines are very unrelated so it is important for any 'newbie' to first determine his 'surname nationality' before searching for his ancestors." I agree thses are two different lines. However, I believe they all decended from a common ancestor. I am aware the english Leeson family that came to MA in the early 1600s from Sulgrave, England. My family came from Co. Tipperary during the famine and settled in Scranton, Pa. While doing research in Scranton I have found Gleasons in the same neighborhood who share the same last name and common first names. However, they come from the two different branches you describe. Also if you look into the decendants of the original Thomas (Leeson) Gleason many have various spellings of thier names, glezen, glasan, etc. I feel the answer to the spelling of the surname has to be traced to the anglicanized version of the name. The original name was spelled in Glalic - O Glasain. This is a close as I can get to the original irish with the character and symbols available on a modern keyboard.


Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Agreement of Use
Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network