Starting Sept. 5, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: U.S. States: Georgia: Camden County

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Martha Ashley Tison, A Member of the Camden County Ashleys
Posted by: Katharine Bachmann (ID *****1998) Date: September 30, 2012 at 17:33:29
In Reply to: Fort, Ashley, Williams families-Camden Co. 1788-1794 by Steven Bench of 177


Much confusing, and irreconcilable information has been written about the Ashley family that was prominent in Camden County, Georgia, starting about 1787. My purpose here is to share information, most of which I believe to be unquestionably correct, about one member of that family, Martha Ashley, born circa 1775, to Nathaniel Ashley and Jane Williams. I hope readers will provide additional, documented information, including any contrary to that I have provided here.

Martha Ashley, married Aaron Tison, probably in Beaufort County, South Carolina, about 1789, as Aaron’s household in 1790 Census included only 1 male over 16 and 1 female. Their first known child was born in Apirl, 1791. Martha’s mother, Jane/Jean Ashley, and hers brother William and Lodowick Ashley were heads of separate households in the Beaufort County, SC census of 1790.

Nathaniel Ashley, a loyalist during the Revolution, his wife and 7 children were living in East Florida when, in 1783, the British were forced to ceded it back to Spain. By 1787, the Ashleys had moved to Camden County, where Nathaniel, William, and Lodowick were among the founders of the town of St. Mary’s in November of that year. On April 28, 1788, the Camden Grand Jury indicted Nathaniel for the murder of Henry O’Neil, an agent of the Spanish government of East Florida. This perhaps explains why the family was in Beaufort County, SC in 1790. The Ashley men were not listed as electors for the Camden County Election in Dec., 1788, thus suggesting they left there before then. The Ashleys do NOT appear in the 1801 Census for Beaufort County, having by 1795 returned to the Camden County/East Florida area.

While other scenarios are possible, it seems likely that Martha met and married Aaron while the Ashley family was temporarily in Beaufort County.

There were Tisons in Beaufort County, before the Ashleys arrived. According to “A History of Beaufort County,” they were part of a large migration there from North Carolina shortly after 1765. John Tison was said to be a brother-in-law of William Stafford, from New Hanover Township, North Carolina, who led the migration. (p. 298, A History of Beaufort County, SC, Volume 1, 1514 to 1861, by Lawrence S. Rowland, Alexander Moore, and George C. Rogers, Jr.) Whether Aaron was related to these Tisons, or merely happened to be in the same location, I cannot determine. John Tison Sr, and John Tison, Jr. were in the 1800 Census for Beaufort County, as was Aaron, but were not found in the 1790 Census. A Job Tison, however, was in the1790, census but was not found in the 1800 Census.

[NOTE: A Job Tison who died in Glynn County in 1824 had a son, Aaron, born        per on-line sources in 1803. Sources, including a family bible, put Job’s birth
year as 1770, putting him in an age range to have been a brother to Aaron, Martha’s husband.]

Aaron Tison was a Baptist minister. According the a history of South Carolina Baptists, he served a number of churches in the state, and had land on Cedar Branch , Prince William’s Parish, Beaufort County, which other records show he was granted in 1797. (Plat, South Carolina Archives, image available of line). “He died March 8, 1805, scarcely passed the meridian of life, leaving a widow and five children.” (South Carolina Baptist, 1670 to 1805, p. 46. )

Martha and their children moved to Camden County before 1809, when she appeared in the county tax digest for that year. Because the children were minors when Aaron died, his estate had to remain open until all of the children reached 21, married, or died. Martha qualified as the administrator of Aaron Estate, and in 1825, she filed an administrative return in Camden County, accounting for the property and expenses of the estate, starting with those of Aaron’s last illness in South Carolina, and including the annual expense of the 5 children from the date of his death (or, the opening of his estate in SC), until each was emancipated by age or marriage.

These are the names of their daughters, (all alive in 1825), and the dates of their birth, implied from when support from the estate was ended, followed by the little information I have as to each:

Penelope Tison, b. 2 April 1791. Penelope died after 1851, and as of the 1850 census, she was unmarried. She adopted her nephew, Charles Fitzwilliam Blake.

Jane Williams Tison, b. 11 July 1796. Jane married first, as his second wife, Joseph Thomas, by whom she had a daughter, Martha Elizabeth. She married second, as his second wife, Jason Brinson, whose first wife was her cousin, Elizabeth Ashley. Martha Elizabeth Thomas married Dr. James Hamilton Hill. [Hill family information is available on line.]

Martha Tison, [married 12 Nov. 1819 (it appears that she was 21 at that time)] I have not found the name of her husband, or any further records for her.

Elizabeth Tison b. 2 Mar. 1801 [no further records found]

Sarah Ann Tison married 26 Aug 1822, at 19. She married Calvin Blake. They were the parents of Charles Fitzwilliam Blake, Penelope Tison Blake, Edwin L. T. Blake, and likely other children. Penelope Tison Blake married Andrew Jackson Philips in Marion County, FL. in 1843, with issue.

[Names of daughters taken, and birth dates extrapolated, from microfilm copies of Camden County Annual Returns and Accounts for Estates, Georgia Archives, Drawer 71, Box 23.]

I was able to find Martha Ashley Tison for certain in the 1830 Census of Camden County. In addition to Martha, there were two adult females, and a young girl in the household, plus 10 slaves. Daughter Jane Tison Thomas, by then a widow, was in her own household, with her young daughter. Sarah Ann Tison Blake lived with her husband and family. That left Penelope as the likely female age 30-39, and either Martha or Elizabeth as the female 20-29. Presumably, the young girl was a daughter of one of them.

In 1840, two females matching Martha and Penelope were living in Penelope Tison’s household [spelled “Tyson” in the census], in Newnansville, Alachua County, Florida Territory. The household consisted of a female 40-49, a female 70-79, plus eleven slaves, only 3 of an age to engage in agriculture. Living nearby was Louisa Tyson, the widow of Aaron Tison, probably the son of Job, discussed above. I did not find an obvious family connection for Martha in this County. Perhaps either Martha or Elizabeth was living there with an unknown husband.

In the 1850 census, Penelope Tison was living in Thomas County, Ga., at the time, the home of her sister Jane W. Tison Thomas Brinson. In her household was her nephew, Charles Fitzwilliam Blake, age 17, and 21 slaves.

Death of Martha Ashley Tison: The following appeared in The Florida News (available on line):

Martha Tison, Executors Notice: “Six weeks after date, I will apply to the Judge of Probate of Duval County, Fl., to be discharged from Executatorship of the Last Will and Testament of Martha Tison, dec., Penelope Tison, Executrix, Feb. 13, 1851.”

Thus, Martha either died in Duval County, or had land there, which would have required an ancillary administration, regardless of the place of her death, to transfer the land in accordance with her will. The only connection I see for Martha and Duval County in 1850 is that her granddaughter, Penelope Tison Blake Philips (daughter of Sarah Ann Tison and Calvin Blake, and wife of Andrew Jackson Philips) lived there. Unfortunately, it appears that wills of that era were not recorded in Duval County, thus leaving us in the dark as to beneficiaries of her estate.

I hope something here will advance the research interests of others. I welcome source-supported additions and correction. Kay (

Notify Administrator about this message?
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network