Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
To answer your question Reinhard about why I did not name Henry Fleeman?
If you will look at some of my other postings you will see where I named Henry Fleeman. The so called deed that you have nameing Henry Fleeman as Thomas Fleeman's father is a deed that you got from me through e-mail. You would not have that proof if it was not for me getting it and sharing it with you. Which after this reply I regret sharing it. I did not intentionally leave out Henry Fleeman's name in this posting on purpose, my focus was on the last name and it's spelling as some researchers keep adding {Fleman} names to our family. I did name Henry Fleeman in my other postings that dealt with who he was altogether.
While you are here posting replies and making remarks as to you having proof to who he was and putting down others postings, remember who made it possible for you to have that name HENRY FLEEMAN and that proof. I am also a descendant of Henry Fleeman as a lot of others that do research are descendants of him also and I work very hard to get the proof that you have received from me, in order for others to know where their family came from and who they are. I along with others spend a lot of time and money for the research of the Fleeman family tree and I share everything I get with you and with others as I have shared certain subscriptions with you, Reinhard, so that you could also do your own research without having to pay for those subscriptions. I will be more selective as to who I share my information and documents with from now on as I can see how appreciative you are for all the court records I have retrieved myself from the courthouses and then shared with you as courtousey to you because of you being in Germany and not having access to them easily.
Good day Reinhard,
Lynn Boivin
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/fleeman/messages/233.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|