|
|
Followup I am still compiling but after speaking with the Hollis Historical Society, I do not believe the Hollis Flagg's hold the missing link to my line. Currently I believe the answer is actually found in Thomas 1637 to Eleazer to Eleazer to Nathan to Eleazer born 1745. If you have any information on Eleazer born in Mass 1745 please advise. thanks Ron Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |