|
|
The Chariton Leader, Chariton, Iowa Thursday, February 7, 1907 'THE BAR OF CHARITON' As They Appear in Court in the Interest of Justice. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ E.W. DRAKE never gets excited while addressing a jury but talks in an even tone like the ripple of the south winds through the arbor vines -- pleasing and with a rhythm which captivates. He never presumes on anything but talks to each member of the panel separately and then collectively as though he has a feeling that some one might feel slighted. He seldom thrusts his thumbs into the arm holes of his vest with an assumption of wisdom but reasons along the lines of a shrewd practitioner who is capable of keeping the witnesses and what they said in his mind. His attitude would not make a striking model for the cartoonist or cause a general feeling of ennui in the jury box. He does not talk in parables or resort to figures of speech which need explanation or which leave doubt as to what he means. He is as cautious as a politician during a "reform" campaign and never fails to tell the jury that they are to decide on the evidence, the court being the interpreter of the law, and that his client is but a modern Elijah held to each by an unfortunate chain of circumstances. He has been known to extract tears but usually passes over dry shod. E.S. WELLS is poetic and dramatic and has a tongue like a Damascus sword and keeps it well whetted up. Sometimes the jury is awed by his eloquence and his power of repartee is a faculty with which few are endowed. He frequently illustrates with passages from Shakespeare and often brings Dante into court. When he gets through with his plea he has usually said all that has a bearing on the case. He has a native wit about him that opens the way to the jury's understanding and is willing to relieve the court of one of its prerogatives -- that of instructing the jury, and you may be sure the cause of his client would not suffer therein. When S.C. HICKMAN arises to address a jury, his attitude is of one just returned from a long journey. He arranges his authorities, sorts up the papers in the case, bows blandly to the court and with a wave of his right hand addresses the jury thus: "Gentlemen, it is this way." Then he proceeds with his arguments. He is a smooth talker and is at no loss for words. You would think he was under oath not to deviate a hairs breadth from the facts and when he does not win out it is simply because he is on the wrong side of the case. He is sure of his contention whether the others are convinced or not and strictly confines his speech to the points at issue. His voice is well modulated and he treats the jury like they were his personal friends and were letting them into his confidences and in return they listen attentively. G.G. FANCHER is as much at ease before a jury as a shylock in a chamber of commerce. He gets directly in front of it and for the time being there are but thirteen people on earth -- he and the jury. He would shake hands with each one separately were it not against the rules of court. His sentences are short and positive. His ideas are clear, and his language plain. He is not tragic in his manner, and gestures only between expressions of thought. He is somewhat technical and no juror goes away feeling that he had been treated to a humorous lecture at public expense. He talks as though he wanted his client to get the worth of his money -- and would say more did he deem it necessary. To Be Continued . . .J.D. THRELKELD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Copied by Nancee(McMurtrey)Seifert November 16, 2004 iggy29@rnetinc.net http://www.rootsweb.com/~ialucas/Main.htm Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2007 The Generations Network |