I can't see an Ethel born Sep quarter 1885 with a surname that looks anything like McGillicutty, or more likely McGillicuddy. There are 20+ McGillicuddys in England in the 1901/11 censuses but no Ethel.
You need the marriage in New York to establish her surname, and, dependent on what NY marriage certs show, her father's name.
I wish I had a pound for every upper class girl who was said to have been disowned/disinherited by her family for marrying beneath her!
Notify Administrator about this message?
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|