Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches...

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: General Topics: DNA Forum

Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches...
Posted by: Tom Young (ID *****6291)	Date: August 07, 2011 at 09:49:13
In Reply to: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... by melissa1	of 4604

The more markers, the higher the resolution. It has to do with the way the MRCA (most recent common ancestor) is calculated. See the FTDNA FAQs for their thresholds.

http://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers.aspx?id=9#922

http://www.familytreedna.com/faq/answers.aspx?id=9#923

Notify Administrator about this message?

Followups:

Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/08/11
- Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/08/11
  - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/08/11
- Matches with Other Surnames Robert Stafford 8/08/11
- Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Robert Stafford 8/08/11
  - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/08/11
    - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Robert Stafford 8/10/11
      - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/13/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/15/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/15/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/15/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/16/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... linda mckee 8/16/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/16/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... linda mckee 8/16/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/17/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Linda McKee 8/17/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/16/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Robert Stafford 8/13/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/14/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/14/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/15/11
      - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/10/11
    - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/08/11
      - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... Tom Young 8/08/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/10/11
        
        Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/08/11
- Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... melissa1 8/08/11
  - Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... john brown 8/08/11
Re: 37 markers vs 67 markers and those mismatches... melissa1 8/07/11

http://genforum.genealogy.com/dna/messages/4145.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Link to GenForum Add Forum