Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
In reply to:
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Elizabeth Ferguson 1/12/09
So we might not be related at 67 or 105 markers?! Or are you just saying our 67 marker match could be 66/67 at that level or 104/105 at that level?? Our any other distance on a related level?
We have a paper trail. I think a 37/37 is good. We have barely any other matches at close ranges.... on 37 markers, most matches that we have on 37 markers is mostly at a genetic distance of 5. I ignore 12 markers.
I think Nordtvedt grouped some "AngloSaxon" because those set of markers were found mainly in the Germanic lowland countries. Netherlands, Northern Germany and Denmark.
I have read that it is impossible to differentiate AngloSaxons from "Vikings".
More Replies:
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Elizabeth Ferguson 1/15/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Justin McNeill 1/16/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Elizabeth Ferguson 1/16/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Justin McNeill 1/17/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Elizabeth Ferguson 1/20/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
John Bryant 1/14/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Justin McNeill 1/14/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
John Bryant 1/14/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Justin McNeill 1/14/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
John Bryant 1/14/09
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?
Robert Stafford 1/15/09
-
How many markers?
John Bryant 1/15/09
-
How many markers?
-
Re: Which I1 Haplotype?