Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion

Chat

Daily Search

My GenForum

Community Standards

Terms of Service

Jump to Forum

Home: Surnames: Cooksey Family Genealogy Forum

Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion
Posted by: Martha Beck	Date: February 01, 1998 at 16:59:21
In Reply to: Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion by Tanis	of 1876

Thanks for answering. Bright Net put Explorer 4 on my computer and I am having trouble sending desc. charts and other attachments. I will try it this way and see if it works. Yes I am interested in all Cooksey's. Some people think that is Samuel and Jamestown, but I think that baby that is listed in 1624/25 would be too young to be Samuel. Some think he is Philip's son who came over in 1659, but it hasn't been proven, that I know of.

Followups:

Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Jane Ratterman 4/13/98 (5)
- Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Ann Gleason 5/16/98 (4)
  - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Carrie Parks 10/15/99
  - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Jane Ratterman 1/07/99 (3)
    - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Darryl H. Lawson 7/05/99 (2)
      - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Suzanne 5/08/02
        
        Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Janet Ivey 6/01/02
      - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Shelia 9/07/99
      - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion-Lydia COOKSEY SHELIA BAKER` 8/22/99 (0)
      - Re: Cooksey On-Line Discussion Betty Feagan 7/06/99 (0)

http://genforum.genealogy.com/cooksey/messages/52.html
Search this forum:	Search all of GenForum: Proximity matching
	Agreement of Use Link to GenForum Add Forum