Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Colburn Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Edward Colburn 1618 NOT married to Hannah Rolfe
Posted by: Mark York (ID *****8184) Date: April 19, 2004 at 10:52:31
In Reply to: Re: Edward Colburn 1618 NOT married to Hannah Rolfe by Barry Wood of 1139

This is interesting, but no I don't. Henry Rolfe and Jane Tie came up in a LDS search. That's the first I've heard of them but as I said until one does a thorough search of the Rolfes there is no way to know, and the deference up until now is for Hannah to be a Rolfe. That came from some place, not out of the blue, despite no clear logic path from this point in time.

I descend from that Ezra born in Ipswich and moved to Dracut with the family. I'm not sure who claimed Hannah was the daughter of Daniel Roffe. I didn't, that's for sure.

Robert came to America with Edward in 1635. He would be an older brother, but we didn't know what happened to him after landing in Boston. Edward went to Ipswich right away so maybe Robert followed after being in the city for ten years. My advice is to follow Henry and Jane. How is another matter.

Pre-Edward the line goes from George to William to William in Rowley Regis north if Birmingham, not Wiltshire as some follow.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/colburn/messages/899.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2009 Ancestry.com